I was browsing my library's young adult section a few days ago, looking for something creepy. I had just picked up two novels by John Green (if I could marry his books, I would; they are utterly fantastic) and was trying to find something on the opposite end of the spectrum. Believe me, I found it. Deviant, by Adrian McKinty, was creepy, yes, but it was truly differed from anything by John Green because of the quality of the writing. Simply put, Deviant was an interesting idea with absolutely horrible execution.
Here's the official description of this story:
"Danny Lopez is new in town. He made a mistake back home in Las Vegas, and now he has landed at an experimental school in Colorado for “tough cases.” At the Cobalt Charter School, everything is scripted—what the teachers say, what the students reply—and no other speaking is allowed. This supercontrolled environment gives kids a second chance to make something of themselves. But with few freedoms, the students become sitting ducks for a killer determined to “clean up” Colorado Springs."
If you want my opinion, which I'm assuming you do because you're reading my blog, the description of this book should go something like this: "An unlikeable, shallow skater boy is sent to a creepy school where everyone wears white gloves and religion is practiced in secret. Then all of a sudden a bunch of neighbourhood cats start getting mutilated, and our Unlikeable Shallow Skater Boy has to figure out whodunnit with his troupe of seriously-underdeveloped rich friends." It's not about a kid's descent into murder. It's not about a killer "cleaning up" Colorado Springs. In fact, even after reading this book, it's hard for me to tell you what it's about, because the sketchy POV switches, various murderers and motives and supernatural-realistic-science-fiction-y twists really don't add up to much. The ending was weak, the dialogue was incredibly unrealistic, and by the end of the book, I was like, "Oh, ___'s the killer? Remind me who that is again?"
I don't know, you may find it cutting-edge or creepy or see something in it I didn't. But personally, I won't be reading this again.
Here's the official description of this story:
"Danny Lopez is new in town. He made a mistake back home in Las Vegas, and now he has landed at an experimental school in Colorado for “tough cases.” At the Cobalt Charter School, everything is scripted—what the teachers say, what the students reply—and no other speaking is allowed. This supercontrolled environment gives kids a second chance to make something of themselves. But with few freedoms, the students become sitting ducks for a killer determined to “clean up” Colorado Springs."
If you want my opinion, which I'm assuming you do because you're reading my blog, the description of this book should go something like this: "An unlikeable, shallow skater boy is sent to a creepy school where everyone wears white gloves and religion is practiced in secret. Then all of a sudden a bunch of neighbourhood cats start getting mutilated, and our Unlikeable Shallow Skater Boy has to figure out whodunnit with his troupe of seriously-underdeveloped rich friends." It's not about a kid's descent into murder. It's not about a killer "cleaning up" Colorado Springs. In fact, even after reading this book, it's hard for me to tell you what it's about, because the sketchy POV switches, various murderers and motives and supernatural-realistic-science-fiction-y twists really don't add up to much. The ending was weak, the dialogue was incredibly unrealistic, and by the end of the book, I was like, "Oh, ___'s the killer? Remind me who that is again?"
I don't know, you may find it cutting-edge or creepy or see something in it I didn't. But personally, I won't be reading this again.
Hungry Lionel gives this:
1.5/5






